An Analysis of the Correlation Between Socioeconomic Status and Obesity Essay

encroach theory is based entirely in magnateiness and how those in precedent do all they can to hold the majority of the population big money and to prevail them from gaining power, so as to secure their receive position. Conflict theorists would severalize that fleshiness is a product of the living conditions, stress and poor shade of solid food and health education. Obesity is seen as deviant and problematic and thereof conflicts with the ideal society of being fit and thin. The more round the less(prenominal) power and stature you start out in society.Conflict theorists might vocalise that those that ar in power, law steelrs, Fortune 500 CEOs, for example, make cheaper good, make goods more unhealthy, and so the poor might only be able to afford cheap, unhealthy bulk food and become hypersensitised to obesity. Conflict theorists might say that food education might be controlled by larger government forces, for example the Food and Drug judicatory and the United States Department of Agriculture. These are the members of society who look out for their own bottom line and corporate interests from sponsors and lobbyists.They might limit education to the highest degree food intake and what is healthy and unhealthy, they might suggest certain foods the likes of beef or milk is healthy to appeal to the dairy industry, to keep our politicians funded with billions of dollars in donations. There is also the argument that by keeping quite a little obese it allows for discrimination at work, in which they must work harder at getting raises because they cannot keep up with their thinner counterparts. Obese people have difficulty with their societal lives and early death and numerous health complications that might pull ahead ensure the status of the powerful few at the blow over of the food chain.The Structural Functionalism theory argument is that obesity is a required part of society. Functionalists major argument is that everything that exist s must have a meaning and must be useful towards society as a whole. Functionalists might argue that obese people will bring attention to the problems in health care and obesity might help in teaching those in power more our emotional connection to food and to further explore mans relationship with eating and nourishment.The obese population might inspire others to be healthier and might declare and educate society as a whole about the dangers of obesity and its overall impact. Functionalist would say that to the obese would be bring an overall gather to society. The symbolic interactionist theory demonstrates the effects towards obese people when they feel they are being perceived in a negative or unflattering way. The verbal and nonverbal cues that a fit or thin person demonstrates might create an obese person to withdraw even further from society and or turn to food as a get by mechanism thereby increasing weight.Obesity is most correlated to social discrimination and a fee ling of being unworthy or tripping due to the inability to resist food, for personal and emotional reasons. Obesity in society is a symbol of unhealthiness and unattractiveness which produces feelings of disgust, but obesity is a symbol in and of itself because our society makes us associate those things with obesity. There are cultures and societies around the world where being obese means status and power and it was seen as sexy and desirable. Everything we do is socially constructed as is our reactions and treatment of obese people.