Path Goal Theory Essay

I have chosen the movie Miracle as an illustration of an individual, herbaceous plant stand, fulfilling the parameters of Robert Houses Path-Goal Theory . There atomic number 18 events that one witnesses passim ones life that for various reasons leave an indelible shanghai on ones heart and soul. The unexpected victory of the US hockey game everyplace the heavily favored Russian aggroup in the 1980 Olympic Games was one of those events. I was at a cocktail party and mortal turned on the TV and soon the entire group was poised around the set, sm tout ensemble talk forgotten, as what has been described as the broadest sporting event of the 20th century unfolded. The country was still recover from the negative forces of the Vietnam War, a weak horn in Carter presidency , and imperishable a low point in national vanity and optimism as Japan and Germany seemed to be gaining defend of the world economy as our armed forces dominance seemed to be slipping past.As the final buzzer rang and the Do you intend in Miracles? issued from the TV, you could feel the surge in national pride and optimism that swept with our little group and of course throughout the all told country. Herb let supplies an extraordinary character of a positive good good manakin of Houses path - design theory, which basically states that the drawing cards, managers, or in this example the coachs mission is to guide his subordinates to follow the best paths to stretchiness their cultivations. According to the theory , the leader employs a variety of leadership demeanors( directing, getwork forcet-oriented , participative, and validating) to strike his mission. The theory alike postulates that each behavior type was affected by adventure variables, environ workforcetal and follower characteristics. The movie afforded a clear personation of the flexibleness required by a leader as he guides and inspires his group to achieve their reciprocal goal by triumphfully ap plying the by- business four diverse leadership behaviors 1) stand employed directive path- goal leader behavior (situations where the leader lets followers know what is expected of them and tells them how to invent out their task.-Wikipedia) throughout the majority of the pictorial matter. later the tryouts carriage put up at at one time sets the tone of his coaching regime by informing his assistant and last-ditchly the Olympic ice hockey advisory board that he would non deliberate either of them when deciding the make-up of the squad. He had basically wear downe bulky homeworkon all of the representers, most of whom he was familiar with through his college experience. support also makes it considerably known that he is not smell for the best scamers but the obligation flirters. This statement sets the tone for the rest of the movie. As a seasoned coach bear recognizes that the best path to winner lies in building a real squad, whose whole is greater than the entirety of its parts, and cl earlyish avoids choosing a dysfunctional dream pol tripe squad. This example also exemplifies the effect of an environmental contingency factor on leader behavior (directive) as stick out recognizes and legally chooses behavior that willing deal with the formal asc closedownance system (Olympic hockey board) and allow him to implement his coaching strategies without interference.A certify example of Brooks use of directive leadership techniques is present by his browsely ask the goldbrickers , Who do you play for?. Early on in the film , they uniformly reply with the names of their college aggroup ups, demonstrating, as Brooks has recognized, that they ar still a group of competitive young men and not a team. He continually challenges them, especially by and by a fight surrounded by former collegiate competes , to start becoming a team and to depend upon flow , passing , and creativity-Who do you play for?. This example flows into the ternary example his strong directive leadership abilities when after(prenominal) an exhi snackion loss to the Swedish national team, he makes the players proceed after the game to skate sprint drills. In between sprints he informs them that if they forefathert want to work during the game, then they can work after it. He tells them that they dont have enough talent to come on on talent alone and that the name on the front of their jersey means a lot more than the one on the back. He repeats his message of win or loose, play like champions.Over and over Brooks shouts Again , driving the players to exhaustion. He doesnt stop, ignoring the pleas of his assistants, until the future team Captain, Mike Eruzione, states I play for team USA. Brooks lets them go and a turning point has been reached. They are finally becoming a team , one of destiny with a common purpose. This also is another example of Brooks employing directive leadership to reach a goal disrespect the effect of a subordinate contingency factor, venue of control. When the team outset came together, they were group of highly competitive and independent group of young men hwho identified with their past institutions. Their locus of control was mainly internal and Brooks, with his opinion of a cohesive tem, dependentupon another and the coach for direction, gradually travel their locus of control toward a more external variety, I play for team USA. He has imposed his will on the team and he is now able to lead direct them completion of their common goal.A third and clear example of directive leadership occurs during a session in the film room where he instructs the team on the tactics and strategy they will employ to be able to stay with the more individually knowing Russians and eventually beat them late in the game .He tells them that they will be better learned than their adversaries and that they will barrage instead of defending. This example also illustrates Brooks employment of Directive leadership taking into musing the effect s Of Environmental ( task social organization)and Subordinate(Percieved ability) chisel tingency Factors to enable the team to reach its ultimate goal. After the film session , Brooks has not only clarified the task structure but has de amercementd the teams perceptual experience of their abilities so that they are now gaining confidence that those abilities will be sufficient to achieve their goal.2) Brooks also employed Achievement- Oriented Leadership (AOL) behavior( situations where the leader sets challenging goals for followers, expects them to coif at their highest level, and shows confidence in their ability to met this expectation.-Wikipedia) throughout the film in various appropriate situations. The first occurrence crawfishs place when Brooks gathers his new chosen squad sets and sets lofty goals for the team. He tells them they are not unspoi conduct going to the Olympics to show but to legitimately compete. He reinforces their already manifest confidence of having already survived a rigorous tryout and warns them that only 20 names will appear on the final roster and that more of them will be going home. I believe Brooks picking of this leadership type behavior was influenced by a Subordinate contingency factor-Experience. Brooks correctly recognizes that his new teams experience is express mail when compared to the other international teams and that confidence in their abilities is an important cornerstone in the team foundation and that the moment called for Achievement Oriented Leadership Behavior.Brooks has correctly identified that his squad would need to be superbly conditioned if they could hope to achieve one of their major goals-beingable to stay button up to the more individually talented and experienced Russians and then outskate them at the end and secure victory. To achieve this announced goal of being the best conditioned team at the Olympic games , Brooks once ove r again employs AOL as he challenges his highly competitive group of players to reach this goal with frequent conditioning drills. His slogan of the legs feed the wolves becomes almost a battle phone call and is heard frequently throughout the film as he encourages the players to cooperate the high physical standards he has set as their goal. Once again Brooks has chosen a leadership behavior pattern(AOL) in consideration Subordinate contingency factor, perceived ability as he reinforces the teams confidence as they see their abilities increase with their remediated conditioning.In one of the most dramatic scenes in the movie which occurs in the locker room redress before the big game with the Russians , Brooks once again demonstrates AOL behavior as he sets the final challenging goal of defeating the Russian team and shows his confidence in their abilities-You were born(p) to be hockey players and sends a highly inspired and confident team out onto the ice .3) An example Her b Brooks exhibiting break downicipative Leader behavior( leaders consulting with followers and asking for their suggestions before making a decision.-Wikipedia.) occurs when the coach is determining his various lines- groups of 3 players who play together and who substituted together in relief of other lines. He summons three players referred to as The Coneheads and instead of taking a directive approach , he passs a clear participative path as he involves the young men in the decision making process as he asks them if they would like playing together as a line and if they thought it was a good fit for them. The players agreed with Brooks and go on to be a very effective line. This shows Brooks once again choosing the correct leader behavior-participative- relative to an Environmental Contingency factor-work group-to achieve surgery goals and group satisfaction.Brooks once again demonstrates participative leadership when well into the teams development, he decides to add a new , very talented college player tothe roster. On their own, 3 team members approach the coach and join an opinion that this new player is not indispensable and should not set about a roster spot of a player who has worked so potent to earn that spot. The coach argues that the new player is very talented and will help the team and asks why the 3 young men do not want him. They respond he is not family . Brooks recognizes that he has achieved his goal of team and has clearly consulted with followers before making a final decision.4) Coach Brooks also employs Supportive Leadership behavior ( behavior directed toward the satisfaction of subordinates needs and preferences. The leader shows concern for the followers psychological well being.- Wikipedia.) and his early fundamental interaction with netkeeper Jim Craig demonstrates this type of leadership behavior. Jim is an large(p) goalie whose play has been fantastic since the recent death of his mother. Brooks knows that against the aggressive Russian team the goalie will play a deciding role. Jim had earlier refused to take a team test and had expected a tongue lashing from Brooks . Instead , Brooks , cognizant of the psychological aspects of the grieving process which are affecting Jims playing and his ability to fully commit emotionally to the team. In private sessions he recognizes and at that placefore validates Jims emotional issues.After the coach points out an erratic executing, Jim is benched and asks the coach is it because he didnt take the test and Brooks replies, No, I want that guy that wouldnt take the test. Jim is named the starter and against the Russians plays an outstanding game, turning back a flowage of shots on goal by the Russians. If the coach had chosen a harsher style, Jim may have very well shut down further and robbed the team of a valuable asset.Once again Brooks has chosen the right leadership behavior Supportive- to bring out the best in his follower, enable them some(preno minal) to reach a common goal. In doing so he had identified the relation between a subordinate contingency factor, locus of control, and the need for the proper leader behavior-Supportive-to achieve the goal. Jim was feeling isolated and distract by his grief, leading to a more internal locus of control and Brooks was able to move him toward a more external perception involving the concept of team, discipline and conformity to leadership by employing that behavior style.In another demonstration of utilization of Supportive leadership, Brooks exhibits compassion and empathy when he drops Ralf Cox from the Olympic squad near the end of the training period. Since Brooks himself was in a similar situation, having been slice from the 1960 Olympic Hockey right before their run for the favorable medal, he individualizedly understands the psychological psychic trauma after a rejection of this magnitude. He personally comforts and consoles Ralf and thanks him for his fine effort and te ll him that he is a great player. This display of supportive leadership could not help but further strengthen the teams belief in their coachs leadership abilities and character.A final example of supportive leadership, occurs , when understanding the psychological and physical trauma of the injured Jack OCallahan, Brooks meets with him privately and assures him that he trunk confident in his ability to perform and that he will not be , as Jack so desperately feared, be cut from the team. Jack goes on to heal and play an important role in the US victory, vindicating Brooks discision and use of supportive leadership.As presented, Herb Brooks clearly demonstrates in the movie Miracle the effective use of Houses Path-Goal Theory as he guides his team, the 1980 US hockey team on its historic journey toward the defeat of the supposed invincible Russian team and the winning of the gold medal. I doubt that Brooks was even alert of Houses work but, guided by experience and instinct he e ffectively employed the various leadership behaviors and the modifying effect of environmental and subordinate contingency factors to gain the trust and respect of his peers and his players, leading them to the ultimate prize. In doing so , Brooks demonstrates to all leaders the importance of flexibility in leadership techniques and of not only gaining the trust of ones followers but the necessity of fostering trust between those followers.Part 2The movie Miracle also illustrates examples of Victor vrooms forecastTheory. As described in Robbins and Judge, pages 86-87, this a motivation theory which postulates there is a certain relationship between personal effort and outcomes and that employees and in our examples, team members, can be actuate to achieve favorable outcomes. ) vroom describes three processes or come tos, 1) Effort Performance , 2) Performance- Reward, and 3) Rewards-Personal Goals and their relationships. In the first joining ( Effort Performance), the individua l ascertains if effort will equate to performance. In the reciprocal ohm link (Performance-Reward) , he or she determines whether there be a coveted outcome following a good performance and in the third link (Rewards-Personal Goals) will those rewards satisfy my personal needs? I believe the following 3 players dynamically exhibited the 3 links or processes of Vrooms Theory. 1)Jimmy Craig-A an highly talented goaltender who led capital of Massachusetts University to the 1978 NCAA contribution 1 championship.Effort-Performance- ab initio deemed the back up goalie, Jimmy makes it clear that he is only attending the try-outs because he promised his mother shortly before she passed away near the end of his college life story to try out for the Olympic squad and win a gold medal.. After he makes the team, both Jimmys attitude and thus his effort increase throughout the early and middle parts of the film as he is shown practicing harder and engaging in extra drills to increase his hand eye co-ordination and conditioning. As these efforts pay off, his performance begins to improve as he obviously knew it would with increased effort, thus demonstrating the link between performance and effort. Performance Reward- Recognizing his improved performance , Coach Brooks rewards Jimmy with the the starting goalie position which led to the further rewards of victories against the teams they needed to overcome in the 1980 Olympics . Against a veteran Russian team it was his outstanding performance(36/39 saves) , especially late in the game , that preserved the US victory.Jimmy and the US team then went on to attain their ultimate reward-the Gold Medal. Reward-Personal Goals- These rewards were of course personally desirable as they led to the skill of personal goals such as fulfilling his mothers wishes and helping to improve his grieving father both emotionally and probably financial as the notoriety and exposure led to a professional Hockey career and eventually a su ccessful long term profession as a motivational speake John J. r, spokesperson, and marketing and sales strategist. 2) MichaelRizzo Eruzione- Mike was a Boston University hockey standout who graduated several years earlier than his in a higher place teammates. He was described by his BU coach, Jack Parker as Pete Rose on skates-Wikipedia. Rizzo went to successfully play 2 years in the International Hockey League before trying out for the 1980 Olympic team. Effort-Performance- It is clearly observable from the onset of the film, that Mike is a long shot to make the team and when he does , he is chosen last. It is also obvious that Rizzo is a graphic leader as he is portrayed settling disputes between rival Minnasota and Boston players and is a critical factor in coalescing the group into an effective team, when as noted in part one is the player who shouts, I play for team USA .He not only gives great effort in practice but also in his born(p) leadership and that led to succes s in performance in both areas Performance Reward- Eruziones all around performance in rewarded by not only making the team but being plant Team captain, a prestigious position. He is then further motivated to play to the limits of his ability and makes the winning shot against the Russians. He is the player that Coach Brooks was talking about when he stated I dont want the best players, I want the right players. Reward-Personal Goals- Initially , recognizing his limited ability Rizzos personal goal was just to make the squad and continue to play hockey a little bit longer and he accomplished this and more, eventually winning a gold medal. It is obvious that his personal goals were different than many of his teammates whose personal goals were to go on and play professional hockey. I suspect he had other personal goals as he was able to parlay his Olympic success into a rewarding business and TV careers. 3)John Jack OCallahan Another extremely talented college hockey standout who also played for and was Captain of the 1979 championship Boston University team. Effort-Performance- Jack was a highly competitive player who always gave carbon% on the ice.He once stated in the movie that he had skated so hard he couldnt feel his legs. He also had definite leader ship abilities and inspired his teammates to also go all out. His continued maximum effort lead to superior performance and a high scoring output. Performance Reward- Jacks outstanding performance led to rewards on several different levels. First, he was easily rewarded with a position on the team and granted significant playing time. Then, when he suffered a potentially season endingknee injury during the collection game against the Russians, Coach Brooks rewarded him with a show of faith by keeping him on the team despite the fact he was not able to play the opening Olympic rounds. Jack was obviously highly motivated by this gesture and vigorously rehabbed and was able to return to play in the key game against the Russians, making a key play that led to a score that tied the game and eventually led to another reward the Gold Medal. Reward- Personal Goals- When Herb Brooks stated in the locker room before the pivotal Russian game, you were born to be Hockey players one of the players that definitely fit that description was Jack.He exemplifies the Expectancy Theory by being able to convert the want awards into fulfillment of his personal goal to play professional hockey, playing 390 games in the NHL. I think this movie and the actual reality it depicts is an excellent example of Vrooms Expectancy Theory. This theory appears to be more applicable to sports than the workplace as there are clear and defined linkages between effort and performance and performance and reward. As compared to the average workplace , the endpoints of reward and personal goals can reach , as we know, extraordinary levels of financial success and notoriety.