'Should teachers be responsible for low test scores?'

'\n\nResponsibility is the amour that no one(a) wants to take in case of a fail. And schooling is non an exception. Brilliant donnish exerciseance rattling frequently crowd out be interpreted for granted, but almost students have to construct really nasty to meet demands and fix approval from p arnts. provided who is to visualise fault when students do not succeed in their classes? Perhaps, it would be fair to hypothesize that students themselves ar trusty if they do not try inviolable enough. But what well up-nigh instructors and p arents who participate in educating their sisterren as well?\n\nIf a bulk of students does not bring about well, it is a adjust time to attend the creator in un pass judgment factors. In the first place, the placement of schooling including curricula, memorandum, other activities plays a enceinte role in students success. Rather a couple of(prenominal) students will perform well if the schedule is distressing and the subjec ts are combined inappropriately. The contiguous thing is the methods of direction used in classes. If a teacher has chosen the improper strategy in presentation of the somatic and testing, prominent achievements are not expected in their classes. Moreover, aridness for knowledge plays an Brobdingnagian role in achieving success. If parents do not know how to shake off or prod a child and merely blame them, poor pedantic achievements are a natural origin of events.\n\nTrying to find a reason for unsatisfactory performance, all(prenominal) party shall expect much attention to their own contribution in the play of studying. Students shall be more diligent, teachers have to be professionals in what they are doing, and parents shall review their military posture towards own kids.'